Friday 20th June 2014: Education ministers are set to make grammar schools less academically selective by insisting they admit more pupils on the basis of social disadvantage. Dr Sheila Lawlor, Politeia's Director, explains that more grammar schools are needed, not more rules.
Britain’s education ministers have launched class war on the grammar schools. Until now their ‘crime’ has been to select pupils on academic grounds, admitting only the brighter children who pass the entrance at 11 plus. Now the claim has been made that grammar schools also favour the well off – those whose parents pay for extra cramming by private tutors.
Friday 13th June 2014: As Mrs Merkel’s Coalition prepares to introduce a minimum wage, the focus will be on how to maintain German competitiveness, says Chris Chope MP.
This week a cross party group of German parliamentarians visited London to learn more about the introduction of the minimum wage, a policy to which Mrs Merkel's Coalition is committed.
Friday 6th June 2014: Last night the Conservatives held Newark in a tough by-election fight. But the results show that voters are switching in their thousands to UKIP. Professor Tim Congdon CBE explains that though the newcomer may seem brash, its goal is noble. It will now be for the prime minister to clarify the status of Britain vis-a-vis the EU.
What kind of Europe do the British people want to have as their neighbour? And what kind of Europe does the Prime Minister of Britain, David Cameron, want if the Conservatives win the next general election?
Friday 30th May 2014: As the EU institutions regroup in Brussels in the wake of the European Parliamentary elections, Professor David Abulafia explains that a Common Market is one thing, whereas a United States of Europe is another.
The European elections have called into question the ‘European project’, or rather, they have shown how dangerous it is to speak of a grand project whose real aims are left in obscurity, and re-interpreted from moment to moment. We know there are people who dream of a United States of Europe. Only the other day, I was talking to an old friend, a much-respected historian, who launched into a passionate paean to a united Europe in which we will all see ourselves as the product of a common civilization. And the day before that, a colleague from a Cambridge college whose members are known for their ‘progressive’ views appeared not to understand what critics of the EU mean by ‘the democratic deficit’; in any case, prosperity, he thought, matters more than liberty. Looking far beyond the EU, a new Penguin book expresses the view that the Singaporean or even the Chinese political model may be better placed to provide long-term economic growth than western liberalism ever can be, while Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century, despite telling criticisms of the author’s handling of statistics, questions the central assumptions of capitalist society.
Friday 23rd May 2014: The central message of this week’s election is not UKIP’s success at the expense of the older parties. Rather, says Sheila Lawlor, the odds are that the elections will show this country to back the sceptics by a good margin.
British voters have now voted in the 2014 May elections. 4,000 council seats were at stake. So too was ‘Europe’ and the 73 seats allocated to British ‘regions’ for the European Parliament. Even before counting of the council votes had finished or that for the European parliament had begun, the message from voters was clear. People are returning to the politics of left and right, to the socialist or conservative values with which they most readily identify. On the left, Labour and the Lib Dems back the bigger state for which tax payers, wealth creators and debt will pay, where command and control will ‘deliver’ the promised utopia in the economy and provide the social goods of daily life - housing, schooling, healthcare, benefits. By contrast, conservatives backing the Conservative party or the newer, radical contender UKIP, believe that for a free and prosperous society, the size, cost and powers of the state should be cut. People, not the state, should shape and choose what they use, from schools to healthcare.